


Welcome to the first homepage edition of i2P for 2012.
In many ways it has been a slow start to the New Year because of having to deal with the “leftovers” from 2011.
One of those items for i2P was that a third-party provider to the site did not advise of a code change to the security section in our subscribe panel, creating a range of frustrated subscribers not able to get on board.
We apologise to all those potential subscribers who were unable to register with us in the second half of 2011, but if you try once more you should have no problem.
Volume 1 Number 1
Volume 1 Number 2
Volume 1 Number 3
Volume 1 Number 4
Volume 1 Number 5
Volume 1 Number 6
Volume 1 Number 7
Volume 2 Number 1
Volume 2 Number 2
Volume 2 Number 3
Volume 2 Number 4
Volume 2 Number 5
Volume 2 Number 6
Volume 2 Number 7
Volume 2 Number 8
Volume 2 Number 9
Volume 2 Number 10
Volume 2 Number 11
Volume 3 Number 1
Volume 3 Number 2
Volume 3 Number 3
Volume 3 Number 4
Volume 3 Number 5
Volume 3 Number 6
Volume 3 Number 7
Volume 3 Number 8
Volume 3 Number 9
Volume 3 Number 10
Volume 3 Number 11
Volume 2012 Number 1
![]() | Staff Writer |
Editing and Researching news and stories about global and local Pharmacy Issues | |
Around two thirds of Australians support a tax on junk food in a bid to stop people eating large amounts of unhealthy meals. Research Australia said 64% of people contacted in its latest annual public opinion poll support a tax on junk food in an attempt to reduce excessive consumption and avoid the damaging health effects.
Around two thirds of Australians support a tax on junk food in a bid to stop people eating large amounts of unhealthy meals.
Research Australia said 64% of people contacted in its latest annual public opinion poll support a tax on junk food in an attempt to reduce excessive consumption and avoid the damaging health effects.
31% of Australians oppose a tax on junk food, with only 16% of people surveyed strongly opposed.
The Australian Government currently imposes high taxes on alcohol and cigarettes and the poll clearly indicates Australians are in favour of a similar tax on junk food.
Research Australia CEO Rebecca James said the results clearly show Australians are becoming more concerned about health and nutrition.
“We all know junk food is bad for us and this tells us Australians want the government to do something about it,” she said.
Ms James believes the tax is an important tool the government can use to discourage unhealthy eating habits.
Research Australia’s 2009 Public Opinion Poll was conducted by Crosby|Textor using qualitative and quantitative methodologies during May, June and July 2009. The quantitative study investigated the views of 806 Australians aged 18 and over, giving a margin of error of 3.5 percent.
About Research Australia
Research Australia is the peak not for profit body for health and medical research. It is a national alliance of over 180 member and supporting organisations working together to promote health and medical research in Australia.
For more information on Research Australia visit www.researchaustralia.org
Return to home
Neil Retallick: Are the discounters impacting community pharmacy beyond margin erosion? | open full screen
Kay Dunkley - BPharm, Grad Dip Hosp Pharm, Grad Dip Health Admin, MPS, MSHPA: Support services for pharmacists and doctors in the United Kingdom – Part 3 Royal Medical Benevolent Fund | open full screen
Staff Writer: Catch the early wave in 2012 and secure your valuable CPD Credits at the Guild Pharmacy Academy – NSW Convention | open full screen
If any difficulty is found in subscribing, please use the "Contact Us" panel found in the navigation bar with the message "subscribe" and your email address.
Submitted by nabinbuzz on Wed, 09/06/2010 - 17:18.
Seems like australians are very much aware of the outcomes of the junk food and fizzy drinks .They are supporting the tax in junk food which inturn will help control people having junk food. It will create a limit.Good job
Post new comment